Classifications For A Personal Injury In Iowa City, IA

by | Apr 30, 2014 | Law Services

A personal injury in Iowa City, IA is defined by the circumstances of the accident itself. For instance, if the victim was injured due to the use of a household product, she or he may have a product’s liability claim. In basic, these cases are classified as a failure to warn, hazardous design, or product defect. If these classifications are relevant to the claim, it is valid, and the victim should submit a claim.

Failure to Warn
Products that could present a risk under certain circumstances require the manufacturer to affix warning labels onto its packaging. This labeling provides consumers with a heightened awareness of these hazards. It also offers a choice as to whether he or she wishes to purchase the product after becoming familiar with these risks.

Hazardous Designs
During testing, the manufacturer discovers probable design flaws that could lead to injuries. These assessments allow them to alter the design as needed to prevent liabilities. The manufacturer has the right to refrain from changing the design.

However, injuries sustained by victims could lead to the recall of these products after a report is filed with the Consumer Rights Protection Agency. Common defects are probable electric shock sustained when using an electric blanket, top-heavy SUVs which flip under the right circumstances, and UV coating on eye wear that does not protect the eyes properly.

Product Defects
All products possess a guide for the manufacturing purposes. Production line workers are required to follow this guide when producing them. Inspections at the completion of the manufacturing cycle identify these defects and allow the company to return them to the assembly for repairs. A failure to discover this defect could lead to a Personal Injury in Iowa City IA such as a burn, cut, or even loss of limb.

How to Identify Your Classification
In basic, a victim who is injured due to a contamination during manufacturing has suffered due to a product defect; proper inspection could have identified this risk. In hazardous design cases, the victim’s injury was due to standard use of the product or based on standard ingredients in which the manufacturer was aware of the hazard. A failure to warn case is caused due to the manufacturer’s negligence or blatant refusal to identify risks associated with using the product.

Recent Articles

Categories

Archives